Absence of Evidence That the Pro Re Nata Regimen Confers Benefit: A Review of the Studies.

Absence of evidence that the pro re nata regimen confers benefit: a review of the studies.

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 May 30;
Yoshida K, Suzuki T, Uchida H, Mimura M

Studies were sought that evaluated the prevalence, effectiveness, and safety of pro re nata (p.r.n.) medications in psychiatric practice for which evidence has been scarce despite their wide application. To this end, a systematic literature search was performed using various search engines (last search: October 2012) with cross-referencing. A total of 34 studies were identified: 16 studies on epidemiological usage, 16 retrospective studies on effectiveness/safety as well as reasons, and only two prospective studies on the effectiveness/safety of p.r.n. medications. All the patients studied were inpatients, and the reasons for p.r.n. were acute behavioral dyscontrol in 29 studies. Psychiatric diagnoses and outcome measures to assess effectiveness/safety varied and were described in 27 and 20 studies, respectively. Medications under study included antipsychotics (mainly chlorpromazine, haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone, or quetiapine), benzodiazepines (mainly diazepam and lorazepam), and antihistamines (mainly diphenhydramine). Altogether, 17 studies reported that p.r.n. medications were effective in psychiatric inpatients. Those two prospective studies targeted solely a child/adolescent population with small sample sizes. Currently available data are limited in number, quality, and scope; there has been only equivocal evidence to guide the choice of p.r.n. medications for psychiatric patients, hence there is a need for more investigations on this important clinical topic. HubMed – addiction

 

Sublingual Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain: A Survey of Clinician Prescribing Practices.

Clin J Pain. 2013 May 30;
Rosen K, Gutierrez A, Haller D, Potter JS

OBJECTIVES:: Sublingual buprenorphine, with and without naloxone, is indicated for the treatment of opioid use disorders. Although not approved for pain, some evidence suggests it may be a safe and effective alternative to conventional opioid analgesics, particularly for those with addiction problems. This study surveyed pain specialists to examine the extent to which sublingual buprenorphine was prescribed for chronic pain and explore associated clinician attitudes and characteristics. METHOD:: A 36-item survey examining clinician attitudes and characteristics related to sublingual buprenorphine and other opioids was distributed to 1307 members of the American Pain Society, a multidisciplinary professional group. Members were provided a paper copy of the survey and URL to an online version. A follow-up letter was mailed after 2 weeks. RESULTS:: Overall, 230 completed surveys were returned (18.5%). Of clinicians who prescribed opioids for chronic pain (92.5%), 19.7% reported prescribing sublingual buprenorphine for chronic pain at least once; of these prescribers, 39.6% did not have a DEA X-waiver to prescribe sublingual buprenorphine for opioid dependence. Prescribers were more likely than nonprescribers to find sublingual buprenorphine effective for chronic pain. Prescribers were also significantly more likely to view sublingual buprenorphine as safer than full agonists in terms of addiction, overdose, and drug interaction. No differences emerged between prescribers and nonprescribers regarding perceptions of potential for drug diversion or in terms of overall opioid prescribing behaviors. DISCUSSION:: Results suggest that sublingual buprenorphine is indeed being used to treat chronic pain; however, the circumstances when this occurs are not entirely clear. HubMed – addiction

 

Dysregulation of Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor and Associated Signaling Networks in Brains of Cocaine Addicts and Cocaine-Treated Rodents.

Neuroscience. 2013 May 28;
Alvaro-Bartolomé M, García-Sevilla JA

The endocannabinoid system is implicated in the neurobiology of cocaine addiction. This study evaluated the status of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors, the endocytic cycle of CB1 receptors, receptor regulatory kinases (GRK), and associated signaling (mTOR and p70S6K) in brain cortex of drug abusers and cocaine- and cannabinoid-treated rodents. The main results indicate that in cocaine adddicts, but not in mixed cocaine/opiate or opiate abusers, CB1 receptor protein in the prefrontal cortex was reduced (-44%, total homogenate) with a concomitant receptor redistribution and/or internalization (decreases in membranes and increases in cytosol). In cocaine addicts, the reductions of CB1 receptors and GRK2/3/5 (-26-30%) indicated receptor desensitization. CB2 receptor protein was not significantly altered in the prefrontal cortex of cocacine addicts. Chronic cocaine in mice and rats also reduced CB1 receptor protein (-41% and -80%) in the cerebral cortex inducing receptor redistribution and/or internalization. The CB1 receptor agonist WIN55212-2 caused receptor downregulation (decreases in membranes and cytosol) and the antagonists rimonabant and AM281 induced opposite effects (receptor upregulation in membranes and cytosol). Rimonabant and AM281 also behaved as inverse agonists on the activation of mTOR and its target p70S6K. Chronic cocaine in mice was associated with tolerance to the acute activation of mTOR and p70S6K. In long-term cocaine addicts, mTOR and p70S6K activations were not altered when compared with controls, indicating that CB1 receptor signaling was dampened. The dysregulation of CB1 receptor, GRK2/3/5, and mTOR/p70S6K signaling by cocaine may contribute to alterations of neuroplasticity and/or neurotoxicity in brains of cocaine addicts. HubMed – addiction

 


 

Michael’s House – Drug Alcohol Addiction Abuse Rehab Treatment Center – http://www.michaelshouse.com Here’s a quick glance at the services provided by Michael’s House in Palm Springs, CA, providing treatment for: drug alcohol sub…